The meter helps accurately monitor flow to ensure accurate enzyme injection
Choosing a flowmeter is not always a straightforward task. Trial and error sometimes proves to be the only effective method of narrowing down what will work in a particular application. There are several choices, including various invasive and non-invasive solutions to flow monitoring. Paddle wheel, turbine and variable area require direct contact with the fluid, while both mag and ultrasonic meters are non-invasive.
Although paddlewheel and variable area flowmeters are more economical, they are not a good choice when the fluid has unknown chemical properties that are abrasive or cause buildup on the unit. A meter without fluid contact proves to be the only solution due to wearing of internal parts, or an impractical maintenance schedule.
URS Div. of URS Corp. provides groundwater remediation services for the Shell Oil Co.’s Carson Terminal in Southern California. The groundwater is contaminated by some unknown bacterial/chemical agent. During the remediation process, the water is pumped through PVC and HDPE pipes, through a series of filters and into a processing chamber where enzymes are injected before being returned to the ground. To be effective, the enzymes must be accurately injected into the water at a rate that is proportional to the water flow rate.
Accurate measurements of the water flow rate and total flow is critical to the application. Initially, paddlewheel type flowmeters had been installed, but a black deposit built up on the paddles which required cleaning every two to three days. The paddlewheel meters were replaced with insertion mag meters which failed after one day, as the coating proved to be non-conductive. A turbine meter was tried and failed after only a few hours of operation. A Doppler-type ultrasonic meter was tested next but it failed to give any measurement at all.
A sample of the subject water was sent to Blue-White’s test lab for analysis. The analysis indicated that there were no particles present that could reflect the sound waves, which made Doppler measurements impossible. However, Transit-Time test measurements were successful using the Sonic-Pro hybrid ultrasonic meter, which can function using either the Doppler or Transit Time measurement methods. The Sonic-Pro was also able to measure and display the sound speed of the fluid which, due to the contaminants, was significantly different from plain water. Knowledge of the actual fluid sound speed is necessary to properly install and calibrate the meter.
In addition, because of the water’s tendency to coat the inside wall of the pipe, which over time also could possibly block the sound waves, the contaminants caused a marked reduction of the sound wave intensity in the groundwater, when compared to clean water. However, the Sonic-Pro’s automatic gain function enabled the meter to function properly over time by increasing and decreasing the sound wave intensity as needed.
Clamp-on Sonic-Pro ultrasonic flowmeters were successfully installed at the site on 2-in. diameter PVC, and 4-in. diameter HDPE pipes, at multiple measurement points. The ultrasonic Transit Time technology proved to be the low maintenance solution to effectively monitor the URS Div. groundwater remediation process for Shell Oil.
Bill McDowell is sales engineer for Blue-White Industries. McDowell can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org 714.893.8529.